双减政策的利与弊辩论赛英语，寻一篇关于为减肥而节食的英语辩论文章

来源：整理时间：2023-09-20 18:14:19 编辑：职业培训教育手机版

本文目录一览

1，寻一篇关于为减肥而节食的英语辩论文章
2，英文辩论稿
3，求助写下英语辩论题
4，英语辩论赛which should receive priority in China environment

1，寻一篇关于为减肥而节食的英语辩论文章

NOT EAT SAME WEAT

寻一篇关于为减肥而节食的英语辩论文章

2，英文辩论稿

更重要的是人际关系的实践能力,一个成功的事业?

英文辩论稿

3，求助写下英语辩论题

您好，看到您的问题将要被新提的问题从问题列表中挤出，问题无人回答过期后会被扣分并且悬赏分也将被没收！所以我给你提几条建议：一，您可以选择在正确的分类下去提问或者到与您问题相关专业网站论坛里去看看，这样知道你问题答案的人才会多一些，回答的人也会多些。二，您可以多认识一些知识丰富的网友，和曾经为你解答过问题的网友经常保持联系，遇到问题时可以直接向这些好友询问，他们会更加真诚热心为你寻找答案的。三，该自己做的事还是必须由自己来做的，有的事还是须由自己的聪明才智来解决的，别人不可能代劳！只有自己做了才是真正属于自己的，别人只能给你提供指导和建议，最终靠自己。您可以不采纳我的答案，但请你一定采纳我的建议哦！虽然我的答案很可能不能解决你的问题，但一定可以使你更好地使用问问哦~~~

同学我看到你了，我是JEFF，CQU口语考试的老师，你最好想点自己的东西。

求助写下英语辩论题

4，英语辩论赛which should receive priority in China environment

当然是可持续发展，发展的同时考虑环境保护。辩论分为两面，可以选择生活中常见的依据就可以。重在英语表达。

正方陈词：good morning everyone! we are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in china we think its environment growth should be chosen. i have three reasons to prove this point. first as a developing country the economy power is far behind the developed counties china have one fifth of the people in the world but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries. so the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy. second economy growth doesnt necessarily conflict with environment protection. we can develop our economy without environment pollution .third when our economy strength become strong we can spend more money and energy on environment protectiontill then it will be a win-win. in a word considering the current situations economy growth should take priority in china. 反方陈词：we agree econonmic growth is needed.but think about the past decadeswe followed the old model of “first pollutionlast treament” however how did it come out? the environment problems have become increasingly prominent and some local regions environment have been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.whats more the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means it placed us in a completely passive position. at the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life urban conservation and the environment.sowe must get to the bottom of the problem and learne from the past that is to say in the course of development we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority. only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably. thats all i want to say. 自由辩论正方：we all know that in many places of china like many poor contrieswhere the environment is pretty goodthere are thousands people 徘徊在贫困线上，lack of maoneyfor the food the need to live.then opponent debatersdo you think we still need to develop our economics? 反方：but opponent debaters cant ignore a fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.we have had the ability to help them.on the contrary the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high .but the pollution is pretty serious accordingly. the overcrowded living areas the foul air the impure water the unbearable noise and rush hour traffic all these things have affected the quality of life. we have money but being under the sub health condition.does it make any sense opponent debaters? 正方：there do exist some estern cities whose economy is quite developed but you forget that china has 130 billion people. and in most place the economy is quite backward the estern cities cant support all need of chinese people. we know that environment protection need high-technology high-tech personnel and science research. they all need a lot of moneyand money is created by economy. i want ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strenth? 反方：environmental protection needs economy . but we cant sacrifice the environment for the economic growth . if you drink polluted water eat the toxic food can we have a high quality of life ? economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection . the policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment. doses it show that the environmental protection is more important? 正方：opponent debaters have refered the returning farmland to forest policy.we admit our country has pay a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit .but we hold the idea that the ep is an appro.. to ensure our economic develop better. as for the incident why we give up the money 。。。。。正方总杰 反方总结: our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy” .the goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . if the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment can we live a better life ? the excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect which lead to sea-level rises . as a result thousands of coastal dweller have to face the fate of the migration . moreoverthe opponent also said ” when our economy strength become strong we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” i want to question that when the animals and plants have died out what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy . if the economic growth delays for two years we can wait two years to develop it .but if the environmental protection delays two years the species will be extinct the resources will exhaust . the urgency like this cant wait . so our side advocate the environmental protection should receive priority in china.thank you.